Sabrina Rubin Erdely, redactor of Rolling Stone, was looking
for a unique and iconic case of rape in American universities and, in early
2014, the story of who knew the world simply as "Jackie" comes to
her, a girl who told that in September 2012 a third-year student she knew as a
lifeguard at the university's aquatic center had invited her to her "first
fraternity party" and it was there that she was the victim of rape by 7 young
initiators of the Fraternity who were led by the mentioned
"Lifeguards".
The fact was basically documented with the victim's stories,
and even though in several interviews the editor felt inconsistent in the
story, the strength of Jackie's stories convinced her that the story was true.
For Erdely, the stone of the shoe was always the one that Jackie did not want
to reveal the name of the lifeguard who had organized the attack against her.
She said she was still afraid of him. That led to tense exchanges between
Erdely and Jackie, but the confrontation ended when Rolling Stone's editors
decided to go ahead without knowing the lifeguard's name or verifying its
existence.
Finally, and after the magazine verified the version with
Jackie, the article was published on November 19, 2014. The online story drew
more than 2.7 million visits, more than any other article previously published
by the magazine other than about a celebrity.
A week after the publication, Erdely managed to get Jackie
to tell her the name of the lifeguard and that was when the alarms went off
since the victim did not know how to specify the subject's last name, which
seemed impossible for the journalist. because of the importance that name had
in Jackie's life.
![]() |
UVA - University of Virginia |
Erdely investigated the alleged name and found no
relationship with the university, which forced her to speak with Sean Woods,
editor of Rolling Stone, who after the investigations wrote a note from the
editors where they retracted for lack of evidence of what published in the case
of violation in the UVA (The University of Virginia).
After multiple clarifications and legal claims, the magazine
settled a lawsuit with the fraternity, agreeing to pay $ 1.65 million in
defamation damages, some of which would be donated to charities that deal with
victims of sexual assault.
This investigation owes its resounding failure in not
respecting the ethical points of journalism, such as:
- Be open to the investigation of the facts.
- Pursue objectivity, even if it is known to be inaccessible.
- Contrast the data with as many journalistic sources, as necessary.
- Clearly differentiate between information and opinion.
Journalism is not improvised nor should it be a race to gain
notoriety. Professional investigation must be thorough and accurate. The
journalist must verify the story and all its sources until its veracity is
fully authenticated.
Journalism must be responsible, transparent, but above all
accurate and objective since the integrity and reputation of those involved is
at stake. Applying the code of ethics is the only guarantee for journalistic
excellence.
References:
https://web.archive.org/web/20141119200349/http://www.rollingstone.com/culture/features/a-rape-on-campus-20141119
Rogers, Tony. "The Top 12 Journalism Scandals Since
2000." ThoughtCo, Feb. 11, 2020,
thoughtco.com/the-top-journalism-scandals-2073750.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/13/business/media/rape-uva-rolling-stone-frat.html
https://duenosdelanoticia.ojo-publico.com/articulo/la-investigacion-de-rolling-stone-un-fracaso-que-era-evitable/
No hay comentarios.:
Publicar un comentario